Let us first consider the Korean War as a war on civilians, which killed as many noncombatants as it did combatants - around 2 million, according to various estimates. In what follows, I will consider first the experience of the war itself for the Korean people, and then the ways in which the war has been interpreted. Depending on their attitude toward the Soviet Union, socialists have either seen the Korean War as a fight for freedom by a plucky, independence-minded people against the might of US imperialism, or as a great power struggle between Washington and Moscow, shorn of the complexities of social upheaval and civil war that accompanied the end of empire and the beginning of partition in Korea itself in 1945. Meanwhile, in the two Koreas, official discourse has for decades subjected the war to various forms of historical amnesia - the “historiography of oblivion,” to borrow Tessa Morris-Suzuki’s term - diverting knowledge and understanding into narrow channels, in a way that often runs counter to the experience of those who were caught up in the conflict.įor its part, the international left has tended to view the war in simplistic terms, when it has bothered to take notice of it at all. Mainstream commentary in the United States has often described Korea as a “forgotten war,” overshadowed by Vietnam and the social upheavals it helped foment.
We should take this opportunity to recover the memory of both what this war meant for the Korean people and its place in twentieth-century history.
June 25 marks the seventieth anniversary of the outbreak of the Korean War in 1950.
0 kommentar(er)
